Carl Emil Overbeck vs Matthew Dellavedova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do Matthew Dellavedova and Carl Emil Overbeck compare in terms of second serve performance? Dellavedova has won 41.29% of these points in the last six months, slightly trailing Overbeck's 41.65%.
• When it comes to returning second serve points, Overbeck outshines Dellavedova, winning 45.12% compared to Dellavedova's 43.60%.
• In first serve returns, Dellavedova has a slight edge with a 28.35% success rate over Overbeck's 27.42%.
• Under pressure, Dellavedova saves 53.02% of breakpoints, marginally better than Overbeck's 51.42%, which could be crucial in tight situations.
• Looking at overall performance, Overbeck has a superior win rate of 68.18% over the past year while Dellavedova holds a 58.62% win rate.
• Both players excel on Hard surfaces with a winning percentage of 58%, though Dellavedova struggles more on I.hard (17% win rate) compared to Overbeck's challenges on Clay (60% win rate).
• At the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level, Dellavedova has a slightly higher win rate of 67.19% compared to Overbeck’s 65.63%.
• Regarding opponent quality, Dellavedova has faced better-ranked players, with an average opponent rank of 359, compared to Overbeck's 396.55.
• In deciding sets, Dellavedova has a slight advantage, winning 65% of them over the past year against Overbeck's 63%.
• As for break point conversion, Overbeck is slightly more efficient, converting 36.31% of opportunities, whereas Dellavedova converts 35.58%.
• What factors might affect the match outcome? Current event form and historical performance at this event could be crucial in evaluating either player's edge.

Editorial Prediction (November 25, 2025, UTC):

Matthew Dellavedova and Carl Emil Overbeck enter this match with closely matched recent stats, yet subtle distinctions could determine the winner. Dellavedova performs slightly better under pressure, crucial for pivotal moments in the match, and he also has a better record in deciding sets, offering an edge in tightly contested games.

While Overbeck boasts a higher overall win percentage in the past year, Dellavedova has faced stronger opponents on average, potentially toughening him for matches against higher-caliber players. This, combined with Dellavedova’s marginally better defensive skills on breakpoints, tilts the balance slightly in his favor.

Considering these evaluations, Matthew Dellavedova is favored to win this upcoming tennis match. His ability to save breakpoints and perform in deciding sets, paired with experience against more competitive opponents, gives him a slight advantage over Carl Emil Overbeck.